Rangers in Karachi on Wednesday evening by officials against the killing of a youth has been condemned from all sides and the prime minister of Pakistan from all other quarters also investigated dhanyan believe are made, until the Supreme Court Chief Justice Mr. Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry took suo moto notice of the case that the Sindh police chief in Sindh Rangers director-general within three days of their removal from positions of command.
The reason for this was disclosed in court that he tried to hide the fact that he and another murder investigation of this incident can affect the highest court about himself feels that the incident in cooperation with the police and Rangers each other looks.
Those who are court orders issued in the light of seven days within one month of issue should be decided.
But this case is so, and so the impact is required?
Do not you think this Rangers team of officials who have committed the crime is not new for them? Do not think that what they are doing them or their practice is an area about which they believe that none of them will not in any way questioned. And in all This behavior is not a or two, all are equal partners Assume: The incident occurred where a TV channel there is no cameraman, and Rangers have come to the attention that this video is for them and how dangerous it too 'competition' part of would make on this whole issue is how are? Denied it was possible that the Rangers who made public the bullet that was not a terrorist target? Or Rangers were attacked?
Interior Minister issued by anyone to be denied this statement can be accessed at the below reports are issued based on who listens and also denies. Until the Supreme Court to take notice of thiswould hesitate?
Just a minute once again see that video of two seconds: how a plain clothes man is bringing a young man, how to hold her hair in the face to the camera says. How he pushed in front of Rangers officials Then, a conversation between them a shot Listen to the word before and after shot of young Listen to complain. the Rangers officials during a frame or body movements and body language sknat see and decide what you feel.
Do not you think this Rangers team of officials who have committed the crime is not new for them? Do not think that what they are doing them or their practice is an area about which they believe that none of them will not in any way questioned. And in all This behavior is not a or two, all are equal partners. None of them do not see that it says Do not shoot, arrest. And when the bullets are killing no one on this complaint ear does not seem ready to sit 'So take me to the hospital, man'.
Rangers in Karachi are now nearly seventeen years, now they be immediately removed from this move here not only the city and citizens will be best for Rangers but for myself I will be very good After this incident can be given a lot of advice:
Rangers in Karachi are now nearly seventeen years, now they be immediately removed from this move here not only the city and citizens will be best for Rangers but for myself I will be very good.
Rangers are spent on police in Karachi they be spent on modern lines and be held afresh. Etc. etc.
I also address and you also hears such things for now no one in Pakistan that question after the incident, law enforcement agencies to rely on themselves to give evidence? How do I explain myself just a casual incident of this because this should be all who do not trust? And that the last incident like this?
The reason for this was disclosed in court that he tried to hide the fact that he and another murder investigation of this incident can affect the highest court about himself feels that the incident in cooperation with the police and Rangers each other looks.
Those who are court orders issued in the light of seven days within one month of issue should be decided.
But this case is so, and so the impact is required?
Do not you think this Rangers team of officials who have committed the crime is not new for them? Do not think that what they are doing them or their practice is an area about which they believe that none of them will not in any way questioned. And in all This behavior is not a or two, all are equal partners Assume: The incident occurred where a TV channel there is no cameraman, and Rangers have come to the attention that this video is for them and how dangerous it too 'competition' part of would make on this whole issue is how are? Denied it was possible that the Rangers who made public the bullet that was not a terrorist target? Or Rangers were attacked?
Interior Minister issued by anyone to be denied this statement can be accessed at the below reports are issued based on who listens and also denies. Until the Supreme Court to take notice of thiswould hesitate?
Just a minute once again see that video of two seconds: how a plain clothes man is bringing a young man, how to hold her hair in the face to the camera says. How he pushed in front of Rangers officials Then, a conversation between them a shot Listen to the word before and after shot of young Listen to complain. the Rangers officials during a frame or body movements and body language sknat see and decide what you feel.
Do not you think this Rangers team of officials who have committed the crime is not new for them? Do not think that what they are doing them or their practice is an area about which they believe that none of them will not in any way questioned. And in all This behavior is not a or two, all are equal partners. None of them do not see that it says Do not shoot, arrest. And when the bullets are killing no one on this complaint ear does not seem ready to sit 'So take me to the hospital, man'.
Rangers in Karachi are now nearly seventeen years, now they be immediately removed from this move here not only the city and citizens will be best for Rangers but for myself I will be very good After this incident can be given a lot of advice:
Rangers in Karachi are now nearly seventeen years, now they be immediately removed from this move here not only the city and citizens will be best for Rangers but for myself I will be very good.
Rangers are spent on police in Karachi they be spent on modern lines and be held afresh. Etc. etc.
I also address and you also hears such things for now no one in Pakistan that question after the incident, law enforcement agencies to rely on themselves to give evidence? How do I explain myself just a casual incident of this because this should be all who do not trust? And that the last incident like this?