Bhutto reference case, Ahmed Raza Kasuri many as will come before

Islamabad (Tariq Butt) next coming days, the Supreme Court filed in the Bhutto case re-open in terms Ahmed Raza Kasuri by early in 1977, Bhutto dated 2 letters echoing sounds will. When Zulfikar Ali Bhutto case Kasuri evidence Bhutto was dismissed when a judge acquitted the 3 Justice Safdar Shah Kasuri these two letters is copied in its decision. Kasuri met his bay for about taby wrote to the then Prime Minister and his political vision defined by. first letter then written when Bhutto, 7 January 1977 the National Assembly dissolved so that schedule 6 months before general elections can be. 10 January, Chief Election Commissioner Justice Sajjad Ahmad, John (Senator Wasim Sajjad father) the election schedule issued. Kasuri 30 January 1977 and noted the letter wrote: "My dear Prime Minister, Sir Earlier I meet you for the military secretary to 6 times more often requested but today date received no response from them. I do not know Major General Imtiaz Ali ever even warned you about this or not? In this letter to you personally by the applicant that according to your convenience as much as I soon made an appointment ". In many cases related to the party and government want to discuss. You know I will be happy to back as the law now full-time professionals have become associated with. my success and improvement / kyjyyy pray for good. 25 dates this month in Lahore, I had detailed meeting with Abdul Hafeez Pirzada. I hope he about to inform you made will be. I hope you and Mrs. Bhutto urd will be. tslymat Sincerely "Ahmed Raza Kasuri". 8 June 1976, the Kasuri by Zulfikar Ali Bhutto wrote to Thus began the letter that "Mexico in the spring session of the International Union for alparlymany Pakistan delegation gzarhun my nomination Thank you." Kasuri further wrote: "We noticed that one of you"scholar statesman "emerged as image and popularity is growing worldwide." Justice Safdar Shah's decision was written that it is interesting that at the beginning of his letter to them to examine Kasuri admitted despite IP UK during his nomination for the meeting to be denied by Bhutto and said that actually his nomination was speaker of the National Assembly. decision was said by witnesses advancements this trick is clearly disappointing But because this is understood. witness to justice looks like his efforts were to be shown that due to his enemy Bhutto nominated her delegation did not, but it is unfortunate that his the letter of his intentions amongst given and their ridiculous made. In this respect, see if its done by another claim that the Bhutto the posts strategy had written because April 1977 until movementViews leader of the public member was and meetings attended had been, therefore, that the 1977 general election for the same reasons the PPP ticket for the application was a apparently did not believe can be and seem wasteful. Justice Safdar Shah was brought more written evidence on the record as highly sensitive nature Kasuri own personality and putting himself at risk issues and severe muٴqf may try them without caring for resultsthey do not agree on issues which have expressed their views in full and have dared to. That is impossible to believe that if Bhutto his father's murder or in any part of Pakistan Assassination Plan participate in planning, they (Kasuri) the (Bhutto) would have peace or different FIRs were lodged in police stations or movement in the National Assembly accused them not above entitlements. "It is clear from the PPP After their efforts failed uprising after the establishment think their actions had no notice was withdrawn from his last muٴqf and Appeal user attempts to win the trust of Bhutto start. their claim that Bhutto is their enemy is insufficient to confirm the fact that Bhutto them was nominated for the parliamentary delegation. However, later by their letters dated Bhutto totally different situation reflects ". JusticeSafdar Shah wrote a letter on January 30 will know that if cursory look Kasuri Bay tklfanh relations with the Bhutto had claimed that because their private matters, as also was their attention "to know that you I'll be happy again as full-time profession was law. I pray for success and improvement. "that" they met in Lahore, Abdul Hafeez Pirzada and from detailed discussions about which Zulfikar Ali Bhutto in the hope that they will be conveyed "and that" he met earlier for Bhutto's military secretary requested more often than 6 times but still received no reply from them not. I do not know whether Major General Imtiaz Ali informed them or not? "." after the text of their letter that eventually the question is how they wrote it under compulsion? He can say he wrote all this strategy. But calling it evidence of witnesses claim letter and statement, keeping in view the language appears misplaced. For me it is clear that this witness letterBhutto tried to get the support that they succeeded because the Margins of the letter written on Bhutto: "I will meet them when the facility will be. Please note my remarks to this letter be returned to them ". decision noted that evidence showed that March in 1976 Bhutto, Kasuri the appointment, and they (Kasuri) April 1976 again PP I joined. 7 January 1977 the National Assembly dissolve the next elections keeping in view the March 1977 in was Kasuri Bhutto met. He then general elections to participate PPP ticket requested, but this request rejected by their constituency tickets assigned to Sardar Ahmed Ali. Now if Bhutto's assassination of his father certainly no relevance testimony (Kasuri) on the PPP ticket to contest elections, should have refused. whether it offers must have also. evidence of the kind that figure in their general election match the opportunity not only reveal Bhutto's dictatorial intentions, but their involvement in the murder of his father's caseshould also take as May 1971 to November 1974 when between them by PPP workers were 14 attacks for them was natural and honorable way.